Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

An Exceptional Case, by Neil Kinkopf

SEC v. Lucia is an extraordinary case in several respects.  First, it is an Appointments Clause case.  When I worked in the Office of Legal Counsel (from 1993-1997), we handled Appointments Clause issues on an at least weekly basis.  In striking contrast, the Supreme Court has only rarely opined on the meaning of the Clause.  […]

Notice & Comment

A Regulatory Budget Is the Linchpin for the Creation of a National Constituency for OIRA, by Jim Tozzi

IWP News has published a thought-provoking series of articles dealing with “the deregulatory efforts of the Trump administration.” One such article reports on the views from third parties on the regulatory budget: “White House efforts to establish a first-time “regulatory budget” would be assisted by the development of a cross-sector, “national constituency” in support of regulatory […]

Notice & Comment

Drawing Two Lines

Let me begin with a confession: I’m not an expert on the meaning of the Appointments Clause. Of course, because I teach administrative law, I know the basics — I’ve read the leading cases and even some law review articles. Even so, I approach this symposium as a layman, not an expert. Yet even as […]

Notice & Comment

Who cares about law? Why the arguments in the amicus curiae’s brief may win the day, by Linda Jellum

The Supreme Court is poised to hear arguments in Raymond J. Lucia v. SEC on Monday, April 23, 2018. The sole issue for which cert was granted is whether administrative law judges (ALJs) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) are officers of the United States within the meaning of the Federal Constitution’s appointments clause. […]

Notice & Comment

The Supreme Court’s Weird Definition of Tax Obstruction

In Marinello v. United States, 584 U.S. — (2018), the Supreme Court wrestled with whether the federal tax obstruction statute reaches conduct unrelated to an ongoing or contemplated IRS proceeding. Section 7212(a) states, in relevant part, that anyone who “corruptly or by force . . . obstructs or impedes, or endeavors to obstruct or impede […]

Notice & Comment

Searching Cell Phones at the Border, by Bernard W. Bell

On January 5, 2018, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”) reported that in fiscal year 2017, it conducted 30,200 searches of electronic devices at border entries. CBP Releases Updated Border Search of Electronic Device Directive and FY17 Statistics (January 5, 2018), accessible at https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/national-media-release/cbp-releases-updated-border-search-electronic-device-directive-and. The number of searches reported included devices carried by people entering and […]

Notice & Comment

Over at Law and Liberty: The Federalist Society’s Chevron Deference Dilemma

Over at the Law and Liberty blog today, I have a post with a provocative (click-baity?) title on Kent Barnett, Christina Boyd, and my new paper Administrative Law’s Political Dynamics (Vanderbilt Law Review forthcoming). Here’s a snippet from my post: The call to eliminate Chevron deference has largely come from those right of center. But it would […]

Notice & Comment

Appointments Clause Symposium on Lucia v. SEC: Are SEC ALJs “Officers of the United States”?

Starting today, for the next two weeks the Notice & Comment blog will run a symposium addressing the Supreme Court’s upcoming consideration of the constitutionality of hiring procedures for administrative law judges in the Securities and Exchange Commission. On Monday, April 23, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Lucia v. SEC, which raises […]

Notice & Comment

United States v. California: A Preliminary Assessment of the Challenge to California’s “Immigrant Worker Protection Act,” by Bernard W. Bell

Many jurisdictions seek to protect undocumented aliens by adopting “sanctuary” policies. Those policies generally constrain the conduct of a state or local government’s own employees. They (1) prohibit public employees from gathering information on the immigration status of those with whom they interact, (2) limit public employees from sharing any such information collected with ICE, […]