Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Rethinking Immigration Exceptionalism(s), by David S. Rubenstein

Donald Trump’s suggestion that we temporarily ban Muslim immigrants from entering the country sent shockwaves through the American psyche. Yet even more shocking, to some, is that Trump’s idea might be constitutional. For more than a century, the Supreme Court has crafted and maintained special doctrines for immigration that depart from mainstream legal norms. If […]

Notice & Comment

The Regulatory Coherence Chapter of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Making the Link Between Adherence to Good Regulatory Practice Principles and Promoting International Trade and Regulatory Cooperation, by Jeff Weiss

In November 2015, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) released the full textof the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP), a free trade agreement that was negotiated by the United States with eleven countries from Asia and the Americas: Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam. The Agreement […]

Notice & Comment

U.S. v. Texas SCOTUS Immigration Case: Federalist Society Teleforum Thursday

It’s fitting that during our week-long online symposium on the intersection of immigration law and administrative law here at the Yale Journal on Regulation the Federalist Society will be hosting a teleforum Thursday on United States v. Texas — the challenge to the Obama Administration’s executive actions on immigration that the Supreme Court will hear […]

Notice & Comment

Employment Authorization and Prosecutorial Discretion: The Case for Immigration Unexceptionalism, by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia

The exercise of prosecutorial discretion or “PD” is an important feature in the immigration system. It requires each DHS component to make decisions about whether a person legally eligible for immigration enforcement should still be allowed to reside in the United States on a temporary basis. PD recognizes that in a universe of limited resources, […]

Notice & Comment

FDA’s Memoranda of Understanding, Quasi-Treaties, and their Role in the Future of Global Administrative Law

In my last post, I detailed the kinds of agreements FDA uses with regulatory partners as part of a three-post series that examines FDA through the lens on the growing literature on “global administrative law.” This final post analyzes FDA’s “steepest” commitments with regulatory partners and argues that in the process of contributing to global […]

Notice & Comment

ABA Adlaw Section Hosts Discussion on FERC v. Electric Power Supply Association

MEDIA CONTACT: Angela Petro: Angela.Petro@americanbar.orgor 202-662-1582 WASHINGTON (February 8, 2016) – On February 9, 2016, the Energy Committee of the American Bar Association Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice will hold a teleconference on the implications of the U.S. Supreme Court’s recent FERC v. Electric Power Supply Association(EPSA) decision. Panelists Joel Eisen, Professor of […]

Notice & Comment

Federal Regional Offices and Functional Federalism, by Dave Owen

In a previous post, I described some recent research on the geographic decentralization of staff and authority within federal government agencies. A key conclusion of that research, and of yesterday’s post, is that the realities of federal governance call into question some key pillars of the conventional wisdom about American federalism. This post addresses a […]

Notice & Comment

Online Symposium: Is Immigration Law Administrative Law?, Introduction by Jill E. Family

What kind of law is immigration law? Is immigration law its own, exceptional creature, independent of all other areas of law? Or, is immigration law more porous, absorbing features of other closely related areas of law? Questions like these have challenged immigration law for some time. Even going back to the Nineteenth Century, the Supreme […]

Notice & Comment

Fighting IRS Regulations Might Become Easier

It has generally been quite difficult for taxpayers to challenge alleged abuses of the IRS’s regulatory authority. Under section 7421(a) of the tax code, courts lack jurisdiction over suits “for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax.” Commentators generally believe that this statute, commonly referred to as the Anti-Injunction Act, prohibits […]

Notice & Comment

DAPA’s Unlawful Presence Problem, by Michael Kagan

Like many immigration law professors, I have long thought that President Obama’s deferred action programs are within the Executive’s statutory and constitutional authority. But as I re-read the Fifth Circuit opinion and the briefs in US v. Texas, I am becoming persuaded that the states challenging DAPA may have a valid point about one aspect […]

Notice & Comment

The Federal Bureaucrats in Your Neighborhood, by Dave Owen

In his influential dissent in Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority , 469 U.S. 528 (1985). Justice Lewis Powell offered up a harsh take on federal administrative governance. “The administration and enforcement of federal laws and regulations,” he wrote, “necessarily are largely in the hands of staff and civil service employees. These employees may […]