<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Yale Journal on Regulation</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.yalejreg.com</provider_url><author_name>Andrew Hessick</author_name><author_url>https://www.yalejreg.com/author/hessick/</author_url><title>Schwartz and Nelson on the SEC&#x2019;s Regulation of Conflict Minerals - Yale Journal on Regulation</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/schwartz-and-nelson-on-the-sec-s-regulation-of-conflict-minerals-by-andy-hessick/"&gt;Schwartz and Nelson on the SEC&#x2019;s Regulation of Conflict Minerals&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;script type='text/javascript'&gt;
&lt;!--//--&gt;&lt;![CDATA[//&gt;&lt;!--
		/*! This file is auto-generated */
		!function(c,d){"use strict";var e=!1,n=!1;if(d.querySelector)if(c.addEventListener)e=!0;if(c.wp=c.wp||{},!c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage)if(c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if(t)if(t.secret||t.message||t.value)if(!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var r,a,i,s=d.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),n=d.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=0;o&lt;n.length;o++)n[o].style.display="none";for(o=0;o&lt;s.length;o++)if(r=s[o],e.source===r.contentWindow){if(r.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message){if(1e3&lt;(i=parseInt(t.value,10)))i=1e3;else if(~~i&lt;200)i=200;r.height=i}if("link"===t.message)if(a=d.createElement("a"),i=d.createElement("a"),a.href=r.getAttribute("src"),i.href=t.value,i.host===a.host)if(d.activeElement===r)c.top.location.href=t.value}}},e)c.addEventListener("message",c.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),d.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",t,!1),c.addEventListener("load",t,!1);function t(){if(!n){n=!0;for(var e,t,r=-1!==navigator.appVersion.indexOf("MSIE 10"),a=!!navigator.userAgent.match(/Trident.*rv:11\./),i=d.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),s=0;s&lt;i.length;s++){if(!(e=i[s]).getAttribute("data-secret"))t=Math.random().toString(36).substr(2,10),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t);if(r||a)(t=e.cloneNode(!0)).removeAttribute("security"),e.parentNode.replaceChild(t,e)}}}}(window,document);
//--&gt;&lt;!]]&gt;
&lt;/script&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/schwartz-and-nelson-on-the-sec-s-regulation-of-conflict-minerals-by-andy-hessick/embed/" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Schwartz and Nelson on the SEC&#x2019;s Regulation of Conflict Minerals&#x201D; &#x2014; Yale Journal on Regulation" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><description>In Business Roundtable v. SEC, 647 F.3d 1144 (D.C. Cir. 2011), the D.C. Circuit held that the SEC must justify all its regulations promulgated under the National Securities Market Improvement Act through cost benefit analysis. Cost-benefit analysis makes sense for many SEC regulations because they focus on easily quantified matters. But they make less sense [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
