Notice & Comment

Author: Bernard Bell

Notice & Comment

Oh SNAP!: The Battle Over “Food Stamp” Redemption Data That May Radically Reshape FOIA Exemption 4 (Part I)

On August 29, the Supreme Court ordered recall of the mandate in an Eighth Circuit case, Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media, 889 F.3d 914 (2018). It issued the Order, available here, in anticipation of a certiorari petition attacking the foundations of well-developed Circuit law defining the scope of Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) […]

Notice & Comment

Welcome to the United States: Installing GPS Tracking Devices at the Border

“Like the Internet, the [Global Positioning System (“GPS”)] is an essential element of the global information infrastructure,” and “is now in everything from cell phones and wristwatches to bulldozers, shipping containers, and ATM’s.”  GPS Applications, GPS.gov.  But, as Justice Brandeis predicted in his famous Olmstead dissent, technological advances augur challenges to individual privacy.  Olmstead v. […]

Notice & Comment

“Hard Look” and “Proceduralized” Review: The Saga of the Abu Ghraib Photographs, 2009 to Present

Between October and December 2003 U.S. military personnel engaged in “sadistic, blatant, and wanton criminal abuse” of Iraqi detainees at Abu Ghraib prison.  See, Seymour M. Hersh, Torture at Abu Ghraid, THE NEW YORKER (May 10, 2004).  Photographs and videos recorded the abuse; a few were published when the abuse was first reported.   See, id.  […]

Notice & Comment

Citizenship and the Census: State of New York v. U.S. Department of Commerce (Round One)(Part IV)

This is the final post in my four-part series discussing Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross’ decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 decennial census form.  The Secretary justified his decision by referencing the Department of Justice’s need for citizenship information in certain Voting Rights Act section 2 litigation.  Plaintiffs in the New York […]

Notice & Comment

Citizenship and the Census: State of New York v. U.S. Department of Commerce (Round One)(Part III)

This is my third post of four posts regarding Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross’ March 26, 2018 decision to add a citizenship question to the 2020 decennial census form.  The first post (here) discussed the disposition of the government’s motion to dismiss two suits challenging the decision.  The second post (here) took Secretary Ross’ reasons […]

Notice & Comment

Citizenship and the Census: State of New York v. U.S. Department of Commerce (Round One)(Part I)

The electorate should choose its representatives, not the other way around. On March 26, 2018, Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross directed the Census Bureau to include a question regarding citizenship on the 2020 census short form distributed to all households.  Memorandum from Wilbur Ross to Karen Dunn Kelley, Under Secretary for Economic Affairs, Department of […]

Notice & Comment

“You’re Fired”: Executive Order 13839 and Civil Service Protections

Posts to this blog have justifiably focused on Lucia v. SEC, 138 S.Ct. 2044 (June 21, 2018), the recent Executive Order entitled “Excepting Administrative Law Judges from the Competitive Service,” and the resultant implications for the administrative judiciary’s independence.  But in the meantime, President Trump has issued three executive orders addressing job protections and related […]

Notice & Comment

A Lemon Cake: Ascribing Religious Motivation in Administrative Adjudications — A Comment on Masterpiece Cakeshop (Part III)

In Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 2018 WL 2465172 (June 4, 2018), the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated a Colorado Civil Right Commission decision requiring a bakery to sell a cake in connection with a same-sex couple’s wedding reception, despite the owner’s religious opposition to same-sex marriage.  It held that unconstitutionally anti-religious bias infected […]

Notice & Comment

A Lemon Cake: Ascribing Religious Motivation in Administrative Adjudications — A Comment on Masterpiece Cakeshop (Part II)

In Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 2018 WL 2465172 (June 4, 2018), the U.S. Supreme Court invalidated a Colorado Civil Right Commission decision requiring a bakery to sell a cake in connection with a same-sex couple’s wedding reception, despite the owner’s religious opposition to same-sex marriage.  It held that unconstitutionally anti-religious bias infected […]

Notice & Comment

A Lemon Cake: Ascribing Religious Motivation in Administrative Adjudications — A Comment on Masterpiece Cakeshop (Part I)

  In Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), the Supreme Court held that the Free Exercise Clause did not require governments to exempt religious adherents from generally applicable laws, even when those laws prohibited self-regarding actions performed as a part of a religious ceremony (namely ingesting peyote).  Id. at 877-79.  Resolving a claim […]

Notice & Comment

TPP. .P

Sometimes the ship of state can be turned abruptly, but sometimes it can’t.  Even though agencies possess great budgetary flexibility, and reallocation of appropriated funds is generally an unreviewable exercise of discretion, see Lincoln v. Vigil, 508 U.S. 182 (1993), a new administration encounter constraints in discontinuing the funding of multiple-year grants made by a […]