In Multiple Chancellors, Professor Bray argued that federal courts should give only a “plaintiff-protective injunction, enjoining the defendant’s conduct only with respect to the plaintiff,” “[n]o matter how important the question and how important the value of uniformity,” with respect to federal defendants. (MC, p. 420; p. 424 (noting that this rule would “logically apply” […]
Professor Mila Sohoni is the author of a string of significant articles on administrative law, and two of her forthcoming articles are about national injunctions. One of these is The Lost History of the “Universal” Injunction, which is forthcoming in the Harvard Law Review. The article is a vigorous argument that national injunctions are in […]
That’s the headline to an article of mine, co-authored with Sam Bray of Notre Dame Law School and published today in The Atlantic. We highlight the disquieting possibility that a single district court in Texas might soon enter an injunction prohibiting the enforcement of all or part of the Affordable Care Act across the entire […]
Since Attorney General Sessions delivered his speech last week at the Federalist Society’s National Student Convention, there has been a lot of talk about nationwide injunctions—injunctions that prohibit the government from enforcing a law against anyone, as opposed to only against a particular plaintiff. While many people have talked about granting these injunctions, one thing that I […]
Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “New Challenges for Federal Regulations: Executive Branch Responses,” by Richard L. Revesz, which is forthcoming in the NYU Law Review. Here is the abstract: Over the last decade, federal regulations have faced increasingly more challenging hurdles. The Supreme Court’s 2024 decision in Loper Bright v. Raimondo, putting an […]
On Friday, the Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Trump v. CASA, holding that universal (or nationwide) injunctions likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress vested in courts in the Judiciary Act of 1789. Accordingly, the Court granted partial stays of the district courts’ preliminary injunctions. In the orders under review, the district courts […]
We have begun the development of panels for the 2025 ABA Administrative Law Conference, which will be held virtually again on November 20-21, 2025. This is a great way to share your research and expertise with around 1,000 regulatory lawyers and scholars. We expect to have twenty panels on various topics. In particular, we would like […]
It is clear now how the Trump Administration plans to handle what remains of modern administrative law while advancing its agenda. The plan is to break it. Just look at the Administration’s conduct over its first 100 days. Wacky executive orders that are no less dangerous for becoming instantly infamous. Abuses of interim final rules, […]
On January 20, 2025, President Trump’s first act was to end birthright citizenship by executive fiat with the “Protecting the Meaning and Value of American Citizenship” executive order. On March 13, 2025, after four federal courts enjoined the implementation of the executive order, the Trump Administration petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to allow him to […]
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) has ignited a firestorm of legal challenges in the Fifth Circuit. In the last five weeks alone, three different district judges have issued three separate opinions resulting in two nationwide injunctions—one of which is already before the Supreme Court. In Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Garland, the plaintiffs contested […]
It’s been a busy summer at the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS), and we have even more exciting work coming down the pipeline this fall. Read on to learn more about our recently published Model Rules of Representative Conduct, the projects coming before ACUS Committees this fall, and how to stream recordings of […]
Two weeks ago, the Supreme Court issued two major decisions concerning judicial review of federal agency regulations. Already, plenty of ink has been spilled praising and deriding the decisions. But to understand whether the decisions should make you gleeful or panicked, it is important to understand both their limits and their breadth. In Loper Bright Enterprises […]
Thank you for your wonderful support in making the 2023 Administrative Law Section Fall Conference another great success. We conducted a Qualtrics survey of all attendees and speakers at the 2023 Conference, and results indicated a majority preference for a Virtual Conference in 2024. As a result, we are planning to again hold a virtual […]
The Notre Dame Law Review hosts an annual symposium on Federal Courts, Practice & Procedure, and this year’s symposium was on the History of the APA & Judicial Review. The event was held in January 2023 at Notre Dame Law School and the print volume, which has just been published, offers a terrific set of […]
Thank you for your wonderful support in making the 2022 Administrative Law Fall Conference another great success. We conducted a Qualtrics survey of all attendees and speakers at the 2022 Conference, and results indicated a majority preference for a Virtual Conference in 2023. As a result, we are planning to hold a virtual conference on […]