In AT&T v. FCC, the Fifth Circuit vacated a $57 million forfeiture order issued by the Federal Communications Commission, ruling that the agency’s internal enforcement process violated AT&T’s constitutional rights under Article III and the Seventh Amendment. The opinion, authored by Judge Stuart Kyle Duncan, represents one of the most significant applications yet of the […]
The Trump Administration has ushered in a new regulatory landscape in the Fifth Circuit. It is relatively peaceful, as most new litigants have brought their claims in forums perceived to be more liberal than that court (which has long been dominated by Republican-appointed judges). As Damonta Morgan and I continue to bring you the latest […]
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) has ignited a firestorm of legal challenges in the Fifth Circuit. In the last five weeks alone, three different district judges have issued three separate opinions resulting in two nationwide injunctions—one of which is already before the Supreme Court. In Texas Top Cop Shop, Inc. v. Garland, the plaintiffs contested […]
The en banc Fifth Circuit released some zingers ahead of the holiday season. In Environment Texas Citizen Lobby, Inc. v. ExxonMobil Corp., the court of appeals issued a one-paragraph per curiam opinion—accompanied by 166 pages of concurrences and dissents—blessing a $14.25 million civil penalty against ExxonMobil. The showdown largely focused on standing. Appellate geeks may […]
Happy Holidays! I am excited to announce that my colleague Mikaela (Schulz) Milligan are joining forces with Shane Pennington to bring you a (somewhat) regular column about admin and regulatory cases in the Fifth Circuit. While I have written for Notice and Comment as a Guest Columnist a few times, this post is my first […]
As readers of Notice & Comment know, the Fifth Circuit has an active administrative law docket and often serves as a proving ground for cases on their way to the Supreme Court. This has been a regular column for the past few years, and I’m excited to take-up regular coverage and commentary on the court […]
UPDATE: My original post, which appears unchanged below, confidently declares that Judge Smith’s invocation of the slogan “stare decisis is for suckers” in his CFPB v. All Am. Check Cashing dissent shows that Judge Smith listens to Strict Scrutiny. Since then, I received this helpful note from Professor Jonathan H. Adler, explaining why he doubts […]
Welcome to another installment of Fifth Circuit Review-Reviewed! As you are no-doubt aware, the Fifth Circuit heard oral argument in Texas v. United States earlier this week, a case challenging the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act. That case is already getting plenty of attention from many capable commentators, so this post will focus on […]
When I saw that this blog had added a regular feature on administrative-law happenings in the Ninth Circuit, I knew it was time to propose a similar D.C. Circuit-Review-Reviewed-style column for the Fifth Circuit. I already report on important administrative law decisions from the Fifth Circuit (as well as other topics) on my own blog, […]