Widener Law Commonwealth’s Gedid Lecture features leaders in government law discussing groundbreaking issues. On April 11, 2023 at 4:30pm Professor Cary Coglianese will give the 2023 Gedid Lecture, “Administrative Governance in the ChatGPT Era . . . and Beyond.” This program is virtual and one CLE credit in PA is available. Please register via this […]
The Judicial Division of the ABA is hosting a virtual CLE webinar on the independence of agency adjudicators on March 17 at 1pm eastern. The focus is on immigration courts, but the program will tie problems with the immigration courts to administrative adjudication generally. Register here: https://www.americanbar.org/events-cle/mtg/web/429200180/?login Speakers: Hon. Joan Churchill, Immigration Judge (Ret.), Chair […]
Please join us for the ABA Administrative Law Section’s yearly Administrative Law CLE Conference on Thursday December 1 and Friday December 2, 2022! The conference will be virtual. This year’s program is stellar. Panel topics include regulating emerging technologies, OIRA, the nondelegation doctrine, and the Major Questions Doctrine– it’s all here! Our Friday Developments panels […]
*This is the second post in a symposium on the decisional independence of administrative adjudicators. For other posts in the series, click here. Immigration law is the poster child for the need for greater decisional independence in agency adjudication. Take, for example, the politicized hiring of immigration judges, executive branch interference in a pending case, […]
We don’t often think of administrative law as a warden, but we should. Administrative law plays a crucial role in the detention of immigrants and in prison policy generally. The Administrative Law Review is hosting a virtual symposium on October 29, 2021 that will explore important questions about the role of administrative law in detention […]
*With apologies to President Roosevelt The Trump administration used its leverage over immigration judges in extremely controversial ways that worsened an already dysfunctional adjudication system. These maneuvers were a manifestation of President Trump’s explicit disdain for providing process and statutory benefits to noncitizens. For example, the Trump administration implemented unrealistic case completion quotas on immigration […]
*This is the first post in a series on Adam Cox and Cristina Rodríguez’s book, The President and Immigration Law. For later posts in the series, click here. This week and next, the Notice and Comment blog is hosting a web symposium on Adam Cox and Cristina Rodríguez’s book, The President and Immigration Law (Oxford […]
President Biden’s immigration bill is now available. In my first look at the bill, I was searching for provisions that would ease the massive problems facing immigration removal adjudication. There is desperate need for reform of the immigration courts, which adjudicate charges of removal brought by the government against non-citizens. The bill avoids major structural […]
The Trump Administration built an invisible border wall that lowered the amount of legal immigration to the United States in the absence of statutory change. Following White House direction, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), the main immigration benefits granting agency, created self-described “workarounds” to the Immigration and Nationality Act. Internal administrative law failed […]
Ten years ago, I wrote about how the problems with immigration adjudication were even worse than previously acknowledged. Today, the problems are even worse than the even worse of ten years ago. Substantive immigration law remains harsh as it continues to limit immigration adjudicators from dispensing proportional consequences. What is even worse: further diminishment of […]
This American Life has produced a broad look at the state of immigration adjudication, from asylum applications to criminal border crossing prosecutions and from applications for legal status to refugee admissions. The discussion about the notebook— a hand-written list of people waiting in line in Mexico to even approach the border– is especially intriguing. The […]
This letter expresses alarm at the Department of Justice’s new performance metrics for immigration judges. The metrics include case completion quotas which affect conditions of employment.
This week the Supreme Court voided a federal statute for vagueness. In his concurring opinion, Justice Gorsuch agreed that the statute is unconstitutionally vague. To support this conclusion, he emphasized his concerns about separation of powers principles. His use of separation of powers concerns in an immigration law case is a signal that Justice Gorsuch […]
The balance of power in immigration law is heavily tilted toward the government. As the Supreme Court’s decision this week in Jennings v. Rodriguez shows, the exact constitutional limits to the government’s power are still unclear. Foreign nationals do have some rights, but they often feel the weight of government power to an exceptional extent. Individuals […]
The Department of Justice is developing a new strategy to reduce a huge backlog in the immigration courts. A recent report of this plan contains this sentence: “DOJ officials criticized immigration lawyers, saying they ‘have purposely used tactics designed to delay’ immigration cases.” Raising claims of delay tactics is a recurring theme in certain efforts […]