Notice & Comment

Author: Guest Author

Notice & Comment

The EU’s New FDI Screening Regulation, Cross-Border M&A Transactions, and Foreign Investments, by Tuğçe Yalçın

This is the first part of a two-part post. For the second part of this post, click here. Introduction On 14 February 2019, the European Parliament agreed to establish an EU-wide mechanism to screen foreign direct investment (“FDI”) on grounds of “security or public order” to protect certain sectors within the European Union (“EU”). Thus, […]

Notice & Comment

SCOTUS Faces a Chevron Decision Tree in American Hospital Association v. Becerra, by Eli Nachmany

The Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in American Hospital Association v. Becerra, a case that presents a question relating to so-called Chevron deference. Chevron USA v. NRDC was a 1984 case in which the Court held that an administrative agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous statute was entitled to judicial deference. But this controversial precedent has […]

Notice & Comment

The D.C. Circuit Undermines Direct Final Rulemaking, by Ronald M. Levin

Twenty-five years ago, the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) brought the technique of “direct final rulemaking” to the attention of the administrative law community. Since that time, agencies have used the technique thousands of times to adopt noncontroversial regulations on an expedited basis. But its legality depends on a creative reading of the […]

Notice & Comment

The End of Deference: An Update from Colorado, by Daniel Ortner

June ended up being an extremely eventful month for state deference. In addition to the Mississippi Supreme Court’s long expected decision to abandon Auer like deference, the Colorado Supreme Court also issued a major decision rejecting both Brand X and Chevron like deference. Previously, while the court had not has expressly voiced its skepticism or […]

Notice & Comment

U.S. v. Arthrex: Exploring Justice Thomas’s Call to Reexamine Edmond – Part 1, by Thomas Berry

Four years ago in NLRB v. SW General (2017), Justice Clarence Thomas argued in a concurring opinion that the general counsel of the NLRB “is likely a principal officer” and that appointing an acting general counsel without Senate consent “raises grave constitutional concerns.” In that concurrence, Justice Thomas applied the test for distinguishing “principal” and […]

Notice & Comment

The Supreme Court’s “Exceptional” Term, by Cary Coglianese, Gabriel Scheffler, and Daniel E. Walters

Much has been made about how to characterize the Supreme Court’s recently finished October 2020 term. Some have suggested it was relatively quiet, especially compared to the heavily anticipated October 2021 term, while others have highlighted potentially important decisions, such as Brnovich and TransUnion, that could fundamentally reshape the law, depending on how they are […]

Notice & Comment

Administrative Law Scholars’ Wild Ride, by Jon Michaels

This past week, the administrative law listserv—and a longer treatment, titled Fasten Your Seatbelts, The FTC Is About to Take Us on a Rollercoaster Ride, published on this blog—has had plenty to say about Chair Lina Khan and her stewardship of the FTC. What motivates me to write, however, is the surprising and surprisingly uncharitable […]

Notice & Comment

The End of Deference: An Update from Mississippi, by Daniel Ortner

For the past year, there have been few major changes on the state deference front. That’s not to say that 2020 was completely uneventful. 2020 did see a few notable dissents, concurrences, and separate opinions critiquing deference. See Woodford v. Ins. Dep’t, 243 A.3d 60, 79 (Pa. 2020) (Donohue, J., concurring) (“When a reviewing court finds […]

Notice & Comment

Do you C what I C? – CIC Services v. IRS and Remedies Under the APA, by Mila Sohoni

The Supreme Court recently decided CIC Services v. Internal Revenue Service, 593 U.S. __ (2021). Commentators on Notice & Comment and elsewhere have already discussed this decision’s implications for the Anti-Injunction Act and challenges to federal taxes. What has apparently gone unnoticed, however, is what the Court’s decision implies for the Administrative Procedure Act and […]

Notice & Comment

Towards a Definition of a FOIA “Record”: The D.C. Circuit’s Decision in Cause of Action Institute v. Department of Justice, by Ryan P. Mulvey & James Valvo, III

The Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) provides the public with access to “records” of the Executive Branch.  It does not provide for disclosure of “information” in the abstract.  Surprisingly, however, the definition of a “record” has never been established, despite the seeming inclusion of such a definition at Section 552(f)(2)(A).  And although there is no […]