Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

The research on malpractice and nursing homes

This is the second post in a series on a proposed CMS rule that would eliminate an Obama-era ban on pre-dispute arbitration for nursing home residents. For the intro, see here. By penalizing injury-causing negligence, tort law is supposed to deter negligent conduct. That’s one of the reasons (but not the only one) that CMS […]

Notice & Comment

Which Sovereign Merits Arbitrary & Capricious Deference in Clean Air Act Federalism Disputes?, by William Yeatman

The Clean Air Act assigns certain fact-based judgments to the EPA, such as setting industry-wide New Source Performance Standards or Maximum Achievable Control Standards. And the Act assigns other such decisions to the states, subject to federal review, including case-by-case determinations of Best Available Control Technology and Best Available Retrofit Technology. This post seeks to […]

Notice & Comment

Agencies’ Responsibilities to Inform Congress: Two Perspectives, by Brian D. Feinstein

That the executive branch must provide information to Congress is well-established. The Constitution obliges the President to “give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union.” Executive agencies are required by statute to submit over 4,000 reports to Congress annually. Congress’s committees hold hundreds of days of oversight hearings every year. But how […]

Notice & Comment

Immigration Administrative Processing: FOIA Response from Department of State, by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia

In April 2014, the Center for Immigrants’ Rights Clinic (on behalf of Maggio & Kattar) filed a FOIA request seeking information about the Department of State’s Administrative Processing Program. This same year, we researched and prepared a “Frequently Asked Questions” document that is available here. Administrative processing, also known as Security Advisory Opinion (SAO), is […]

Notice & Comment

Nursing homes, mandatory arbitration, and administrative law

Emboldened by a string of aggressive Supreme Court decisions, businesses are increasingly turning to arbitration to shield themselves from civil litigation. Odds are, for example, that you’ve signed away your right to sue your cell phone carrier and cable company. Not that you noticed. You just clicked “yes” when asked if you’d read pages of […]

Notice & Comment

What the Law Is vs. What the Executive Is Willing to Argue: Understanding the Stakes of the Emoluments Debate, by Jane Chong

Editor’s Note: This post is a response to a recent post by Andy Grewal. Three lawsuits recently filed against President Donald Trump for allegedly unlawfully profiting from his financial empire do more than breathe new life into some obscure constitutional provisions. They serve as an important reminder that, under the Trump administration, the battle over […]

Notice & Comment

Exploitation of Public Office and the Foreign Emoluments Clause

Under the Foreign Emoluments Clause, a person holding an office of profit or trust under the United States (a U.S. Officer) cannot, without Congressional consent, accept an “emolument . . . of any kind whatever” from a foreign government. The clause has received many legislative and executive interpretations over the years, but it has only […]