Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Only One-Third of Proposed Regulatory Obligations Survive to the Final Rule, by Andrew Leahey

Notice-and-comment rulemaking is the core mechanism through which the public can shape regulation. As such, courts ask whether agencies have responded adequately to significant comments and scholars often examine whether final rules differ from proposals that precede them—but those approaches typically measure change at the level of entire regulations or, more broadly, documents. That is […]

Notice & Comment

Loper Bright and the Future of the Republican Coalition

For more than thirty years, Republicans in all three branches of the national government worked to overturn Chevron and eliminate judicial deference to administrative agencies. As former White House counsel Don McGahn explained, their objective was “to corral the runaway bureaucracy to get judges in place who were actually going to read the law as […]

Notice & Comment

Can We Legally Trade on Anything? by Oren Stern

Prediction Markets allow you to “trade on anything” but does “anything” really mean anything? There is certainly some truth to their claim. Extraterrestrial enthusiasts can purchase a contract on Kalshi that will pay out if the government confirms aliens exist. Polymarket caters to the more spiritual among us, offering trades on whether Jesus Christ will […]

Notice & Comment

The Change-in-Position Doctrine After Centro de Trabajadores (D.C. Cir.)

As noted on this blog, last month the D.C. Circuit issued an opinion in Centro de Trabajadores Unidos v. Bessent, which has gotten some attention for describing Loper Bright as “upend[ing] th[e] foundation” for challenges to changes in agency statutory interpretations. But a close examination of the point that the D.C. Circuit made reveals that […]

Notice & Comment

Ad Law Reading Room: “Vacatur Within the Appellate Model of Judicial Review,” by Emily Bremer

Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “Vacatur Within the Appellate Model of Judicial Review,” by Emily Bremer, which is forthcoming in the Yale Law Journal. Here is the abstract: This Article situates vacatur within a holistic account of the appellate model of judicial review that Congress codified in the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Revisionist […]

Notice & Comment

Oral Argument Preview: Montgomery v Caribe Transport

This week, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport, a major regulatory case. A quick way to estimate any case’s importance is to look at which groups are interested enough to submit amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs. Based on this metric, Caribe Transport is a blockbuster, featuring amicus […]

Notice & Comment

Comparative Administrative Law New Scholarship Corner (February 2026)

Here is the list of works included in the February 2026 Comparative Administrative Law Scholarship Corner, which is curated by Eduardo Jordão (FGV Law School, Rio de Janeiro), with the assistance of Eduarda Onzi. The Scholarship Corner is a resource provided through the Comparative Administrative Law listserv. For more information about this terrific resource, check out my first […]

Notice & Comment

ACUS Adopts Four New Recommendations at 84th Plenary Session

Last month, the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) held its 84th Plenary Session at which the Assembly adopted four new recommendations: Recommendation 2026-1, Obtaining Government Records for Use in Agency Proceedings, provides agencies with best practices for making government records available for use in agency proceedings in order to promote the fairness, accuracy, consistency, timeliness, […]

Notice & Comment

Vesting Clause Asymmetry in Justice Thomas’s Learning Resources Dissent

The Supreme Court’s opinion in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump is sure to garner countless news reports, media commentaries, and academic responses. Much of this attention will focus on Chief Justice Roberts’s majority opinion holding that President Trump’s attempts to impose sweeping import duties were not statutorily authorized by the International Emergency Economic Powers Act […]

Notice & Comment

Tallying the Votes from Learning Resources, the Major Questions Doctrine Remains Relatively Confined

Since the Supreme Court announced the major questions doctrine in 2022, the doctrine has generated extensive confusion in lower courts and academic commentary. As colleagues and I explained in an amicus brief in the Supreme Court’s tariffs litigation, lower courts have expressed considerable confusion over both when the major questions doctrine applies and how the […]

Notice & Comment

Administrative Law SSRN Reading List, January 2026 Edition

Here is the January 2026 Edition of the most-downloaded recent papers (those announced in the last 60 days) from SSRN’s U.S. Administrative Law eJournal, which is edited by Bill Funk. For more on why SSRN and this eJournal are such terrific resources for administrative law scholars and practitioners, check out my first post on the subject here. You can […]

Notice & Comment

APA Vacatur and the Complete-Relief Principle

Justice Barrett’s majority opinion in Trump v. CASA, Inc. assured everyone that vacatur was not on the chopping block: “Nothing we say today resolves the distinct question whether the Administrative Procedure Act authorizes federal courts to vacate federal agency action.” By my lights, CASA did resolve that question—just not in so many words, and not […]