Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Freedom to Earn, Freedom to Speak, and Freedom to Compete: Protecting MLM Workers in a Perilous Economy, by Samuel Levine

Like many Americans, I’m deeply alarmed by the escalating attacks on consumer protection in Washington – especially the efforts to gut the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Weakening this vital agency will lead to more fraud, more predatory lending, and greater risk of another economic crisis. I’m also deeply troubled by recent developments at the Federal […]

Notice & Comment

Presidential Directives on Federal Regulation

Among the 161 Executive Orders that President Trump has issued during his second term through June 12, 2025,  at least nine relate to federal regulation.  These are identified in paragraph 6 below.  (The designation “at least nine” is to recognize that the definitional boundaries of which executive orders relate to federal regulation are somewhat subjective […]

Notice & Comment

States Should Oppose All Use of Nationwide Injunctions, by Thomas A. Barnico

With the legality and wisdom of “nationwide” injunctions at issue in the courts and Congress, it is time for the states to view the problem through the lens of federalism. Using this lens, the states should oppose all use of nationwide injunctions and support their limitation by the Supreme Court and Congress because the exercise of such […]

Notice & Comment

The State-Law Origins of the APA’s “Set Aside” Power, by Fred Halbhuber

Section 706(2) of the APA provides, in deceptively simple language, that a “reviewing court shall . . . hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions . . . not in accordance with law.” In the ongoing debate over the scope of relief under the APA, much depends on the “semantic content of the phrase ‘set aside.’” In a recent working […]

Notice & Comment

Rethinking Removal Protections, by Alisa Klein

The Supreme Court’s stay order in Trump v. Wilcox confirms that the Court is poised to rethink the precedents that govern the removal of federal officers. If so, the Court should rethink a central premise from scratch. In the Wilcox stay order, the Supreme Court treated the validity of removal protections as a binary question: […]

Notice & Comment

Janus-Faced Interpretation, by Daniel E. Walters

As most will recall, the Supreme Court has spent the last several years reinventing statutory interpretation in agency cases. That project has now been pithily summarized in the recent opinion in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County: “As a general matter, when an agency interprets a statute, judicial review of the agency’s interpretation is […]

Notice & Comment

Ad Law Reading Room: “Designing Policymaking Mechanisms for Regulatory Dynamism,” by Cohen, Edwards, Jones, and Ohm

Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “Designing Policymaking Mechanisms for Regulatory Dynamism,” by Julie E. Cohen, Nina-Simone Edwards, Meg Leta Jones, and Paul Ohm. Here is the abstract: The administrative state is struggling to counter the harms of today’s information economy. Existing mechanisms for policymaking fall short both substantively and procedurally. Substantively, regulators face […]

Notice & Comment

The Curious Case of Brendan Carr Versus EchoStar, by Lawrence J. Spiwak

The telecom community’s ears recently perked up when the Wall Street Journal reported that Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr sent a letter to Charlie Ergen, Chairman of the Board of EchoStar Corporation, threatening to revoke a significant portion of the company’s spectrum licenses.  According to Carr, EchoStar is “warehousing” spectrum by failing to […]

Notice & Comment

A Victory for Federal Workers in the Fourth Circuit, by Jordan Ascher

Federal employees seeking to challenge the Trump Administration’s unprecedented efforts to dismantle federal agencies and decimate the civil service have faced a dilemma. The federal Civil Service Reform Act (CSRA) generally permits employees to contest serious adverse personnel actions only before an administrative body, the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), rather than in federal district […]