Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Campaign Legal Center v. DOJ — FOIA Postscript to Department of Commerce v. New York (Part II)

Can an agency properly invoke the deliberative process privilege to shield internal deliberations over a sham memo requesting that another agency take action, knowing that the recipient agency will use the request to hide the real reason for its contemplated action?  Earlier this year, the D.C. Circuit answered in the affirmative. Campaign Legal Center v. […]

Notice & Comment

The CFPB’s Blank Check—or, Delegating Congress’s Power of the Purse

In one of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s first strategic plans, the then-new agency highlighted Congress’s decision to vest it with a completely independent source of revenue: “providing the CFPB with funding outside of the congressional appropriations process,” Congress had  “ensure[d] full independence” for the agency.  The agency’s declaration of independence from future congressional appropriations […]

Notice & Comment

Campaign Legal Center v. DOJ — FOIA Postscript to Department of Commerce v. New York (Part I)

Can an agency properly invoke the deliberative process privilege to shield internal deliberations over a sham memo requesting that another agency take action, knowing that the recipient agency will use the request to hide the real reason for its contemplated action?  Earlier this year, the D.C. Circuit answered in the affirmative. Campaign Legal Center v. […]

Notice & Comment

Laurence Silberman: The Public Service that Helped to Form a Judge

The news of Judge Laurence Silberman’s passing on October 2 spurred a wave of remembrances from colleagues, admirers, former proteges, Supreme Court justices, and many more. Some of my AEI colleagues contributed writings of their own: Robert Doar, Yuval Levin, and John Yoo.  His contributions to the law—particularly in respecting and reinforcing the Constitution’s separation of powers—were immense, as many of his […]

Notice & Comment

Enforcement Policy is a Political Question in United States v. Texas, by Zachary Price

Next week, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in United States v. Texas, a suit challenging the Biden Administration’s current immigration enforcement priorities. The Court should reject this challenge for reasons I outlined in a 2016 article. Although the administration’s policy may fall short of ideal faithful execution of federal law, its deficiencies present a […]

Notice & Comment

Presidentialism, Democracy, Interpretation: Notes of a Grateful Author (Part 2), by Peter M. Shane

*This is the sixteenth and final post in a symposium on Peter Shane’s “Democracy’s Chief Executive: Interpreting the Constitution and Defining the Future of the Presidency.” For other posts in the series, click here. In Part 1 of my response to the wonderful set of fourteen essays commenting on my book, Democracy’s Chief Executive: Interpreting the […]

Notice & Comment

Do Agencies Have the Capacity to be Reasonable?, by David E. Lewis

*This is the fifth post on a symposium on Jed Stiglitz’s “The Reasoning State.” For other posts in the series, click here. In Jed Stiglitz’s important new book, he argues that legislators delegate policymaking authority to administrative agencies because of agencies’ ability to solve a trust problem between voters and elected officials. Voters confronted with an […]

Notice & Comment

Presidentialism, Democracy, Interpretation: Notes of a Grateful Author (Part 1), by Peter M. Shane

*This is the fifteenth post in a symposium on Peter Shane’s “Democracy’s Chief Executive: Interpreting the Constitution and Defining the Future of the Presidency.” For other posts in the series, click here. My first reaction to the just-ended three-week symposium on my book, Democracy’s Chief Executive: Interpreting the Constitution and Defining the Future of the Presidency […]

Notice & Comment

Putting Agency Reason-Giving to the Test, by Kevin M. Stack 

*This is the fourth post on a symposium on Jed Stiglitz’s “The Reasoning State.” For other posts in the series, click here. “[A]gencies do not have quite the prerogative of obscurantism reserved to legislatures.”  This observation, one of my favorites in the widely taught United States v. Nova Scotia Food Products Corp., describes fundamental features of […]

Notice & Comment

Acknowledging Values in Administration, by Bijal Shah

*This is the third post on a symposium on Jed Stiglitz’s “The Reasoning State.” For other posts in the series, click here. I am delighted to participate in a symposium on Professor Jed Stiglitz’s new book, The Reasoning State. Stiglitz contends that the administrative state—and in particular, the transfer of authority from Congress to agencies—is justified […]

Notice & Comment

Credible Reasoning, Contestation, and Dynamic Preference Production, by Anya Bernstein

*This is the second post on a symposium on Jed Stiglitz’s “The Reasoning State.” For other posts in the series, click here. The Reasoning State presents a broadly interdisciplinary discussion and defense of the administrative state. Jed Stiglitz engages with history, political science, and psychology to argue that credible reasoning about policy matters, incentivized and enforced […]