Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Comparative Administrative Law Scholarship Corner (October 2025)

Here is the list of works included in the October 2025 Comparative Administrative Law Scholarship Corner, which is curated by Eduardo Jordão (FGV Law School, Rio de Janeiro), with the assistance of Eduarda Onzi. The Scholarship Corner is a resource provided through the Comparative Administrative Law listserv. For more information about this terrific resource, check out my first […]

Notice & Comment

Winner of the 2026 AALS Administrative Law Section Emerging Scholar Award

From Timothy Lytton, Chair of the Association of American Law Schools (AALS) Administrative Law Section: The executive committee of the AALS section on Administrative Law and the award selection committee are pleased to announce that the winner of the 2026 Emerging Scholars Award for Outstanding Scholarly Publication is Adam Crews for his article Visions of Vermont […]

Notice & Comment

OIRA’s Bad Benefit-Cost Analysis, by Andrew Stawasz

On October 21, OIRA’s Acting Administrator signed M-25-36, “Streamlining the Review of Deregulatory Actions.” I will leave it to others to comment more fully on many of its provisions, including: Instead, I want to focus on Part III, on deregulation’s purportedly unique benefits. The memo makes many claims that fly in the face of sound […]

Notice & Comment

Unlawful but Unreviewable: The D.C. Circuit’s New Dalton Jurisprudence, by Patrick Jacobi & Jonas Monast

The Supreme Court has enabled a dramatic expansion of executive power during the first nine months of the Trump Administration.  Much of this has occurred with minimal or no explanation on the emergency docket, allowing the Administration to proceed without any consideration, much less a determination, of whether the challenged, ongoing activity is lawful.  Examples […]

Notice & Comment

Registration is OPEN: Annual ABA Administrative Law Virtual Conference, November 20-21, 2025

The November 20-21, 2025 Annual ABA Administrative Law Conference registration is now open!  Please see the conference brochure for more information and a registration form.  In view of current conditions, registration rates are significantly reduced.  Individuals may register online. Groups should contact the service center – instructions are on the last page of the brochure.   […]

Notice & Comment

Centering Proportionality in the Administrative Procedure Act

This post is part of Notice & Comment’s symposium on the Senate Post-Chevron Working Group Report. For other posts in the series, click here. In this era of the rapid change in administrative law—both at the Supreme Court and from the White House—I am grateful that Senator Schmitt has stepped up as a thought leader in the Senate […]

Notice & Comment

Congress after Loper Bright: Prioritize Modernization and Learning, by Dane Stangler, Michael Thorning, & J.D. Rackey

This post is part of Notice & Comment’s symposium on the Senate Post-Chevron Working Group Report. For other posts in the series, click here. We agree with Sen. Eric Schmitt that “Congress must reclaim the habit of legislating.” While much of the senator’s report and commentary addresses the challenges posed by the administrative state, we hope he and […]

Notice & Comment

Congressional Review Act(ion) After Loper Bright, by Eric Wessan

This post is part of Notice & Comment’s symposium on the Senate Post-Chevron Working Group Report. For other posts in the series, click here. The Congressional Review Act is a congressional eraser that wipes agency rules clean—and prevents their future reenactment. President Trump is wielding the Act more effectively than ever before, with a Republican trifecta in control […]

Notice & Comment

Reconciling the Unitary Executive and the Opinions Clause, by Michael B. Rappaport

One of the strongest arguments against the unitary executive interpretation of the Constitution is based on the Opinions Clause.  If the President has constitutional authority to direct executive branch officials, why was a clause that authorized him to “require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments” needed?  After […]