Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Regulatory Tariffs Can Permissibly Raise Revenue: A Response to Professors Amar

At oral argument in the tariff cases, a so-called “donut hole” argument was raised.  The argument maintains it would be highly unlikely for the statutory phrase “regulate … importation” to confer a host of unenumerated powers—including the power to impose licensing fees—but not confer the power to regulate importation by imposing duties (i.e., tariffs).  The donut hole argument […]

Notice & Comment

Navigating the Web of Agency Authority with AI, by Patrick A. McLaughlin & Mitchell Scacchi

Despite the overwhelming concern over the use of artificial intelligence, one of the most promising use cases for AI is regulatory reform. Regulatory accumulation — the slow accumulation of rules, related guidance, case law, and specialized knowledge — has created a knowledge base that no human brain could contain, let alone comprehensively analyze. AI, on […]

Notice & Comment

Ad Law Reading Room: “How Not to Design Expert Bureaucracy: Lessons from Administrative Law,” by Wendy Wagner

Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “How Not to Design Expert Bureaucracy: Lessons from Administrative Law,” by Wendy E. Wagner, which is forthcoming in the North Carolina Law Review. Here is the abstract: Can we trust our agency experts to provide reliable scientific knowledge to inform policy? This question has worried academics, policymakers, and […]

Notice & Comment

Are Pulte’s “Mortgage Fraud” Investigations Legal?, by Domenic Powell

Now that the Department of Justice has taken the dramatic step of indicting New York Attorney General Letitia “Tish” James, plenty of ink and pixels have been spent assessing the procedural missteps of the prosecution and the strength of the evidence. An important question was lost in the shuffle: was the investigation of James legal […]

Notice & Comment

Comparative Administrative Law Scholarship Corner (October 2025)

Here is the list of works included in the October 2025 Comparative Administrative Law Scholarship Corner, which is curated by Eduardo Jordão (FGV Law School, Rio de Janeiro), with the assistance of Eduarda Onzi. The Scholarship Corner is a resource provided through the Comparative Administrative Law listserv. For more information about this terrific resource, check out my first […]

Notice & Comment

Winner of the 2026 AALS Administrative Law Section Emerging Scholar Award

From Timothy Lytton, Chair of the Association of American Law Schools (AALS) Administrative Law Section: The executive committee of the AALS section on Administrative Law and the award selection committee are pleased to announce that the winner of the 2026 Emerging Scholars Award for Outstanding Scholarly Publication is Adam Crews for his article Visions of Vermont […]

Notice & Comment

OIRA’s Bad Benefit-Cost Analysis, by Andrew Stawasz

On October 21, OIRA’s Acting Administrator signed M-25-36, “Streamlining the Review of Deregulatory Actions.” I will leave it to others to comment more fully on many of its provisions, including: Instead, I want to focus on Part III, on deregulation’s purportedly unique benefits. The memo makes many claims that fly in the face of sound […]

Notice & Comment

Unlawful but Unreviewable: The D.C. Circuit’s New Dalton Jurisprudence, by Patrick Jacobi & Jonas Monast

The Supreme Court has enabled a dramatic expansion of executive power during the first nine months of the Trump Administration.  Much of this has occurred with minimal or no explanation on the emergency docket, allowing the Administration to proceed without any consideration, much less a determination, of whether the challenged, ongoing activity is lawful.  Examples […]