Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Ad Law Reading Room: “Protecting Perkins: Removal, Supervision, and Article II,” by Amy Wildermuth and Peyton Baker

Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “Protecting Perkins: Removal, Supervision, and Article II,” by Amy J. Wildermuth and Peyton C. Baker. Here is the abstract: With the Supreme Court almost certain to invalidate statutory removal restrictions protecting most principal officers, administrative law scholars’ gaze has turned to lower levels of the federal bureaucracy (see, […]

Notice & Comment

Seeking Proportionality in Administrative Law

The George Washington Law Review invited me to pen the foreword to its annual administrative law issue this year, and I decided to use the opportunity to think a bit bigger about the future of administrative law. I’ve posted to SSRN a draft of that foreword, entitled Proportionality in Administrative Law. I’m honored to share […]

Notice & Comment

New ABA Book: Leading Cases in Administrative Law

Several years ago, Anna Shavers and Matt Wiener agreed to put together an edited volume on the leading cases in administrative law. The ABA Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice assembled a case selection committee and then invited nearly forty scholars in the field to contribute a chapter. During the editing process, my dear […]

Notice & Comment

Registration Open: 2026 ABA Spring Administrative Law Conference, May 7-8, 2026, Washington DC

The ABA Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice Section’s Spring Conference will feature these hot-topic CLE programs on Friday, May 8: Join us in Washington, D.C., for these programs and academic workshops featuring new articles presented on Thursday, May 7. Registration fees for the conference are as follows: For full details and registration, visit here.

Notice & Comment

A Tale of Two Shutdowns and Growing Presidential Power

We’re now over a month into the second shutdown of the second Trump administration.  What have we learned? Mainly that the problem of “separation of parties, not powers” is growing worse and, in consequence, Congress’s power of the purse may be unravelling. Shutdowns happen because of time-limited appropriations. By providing funds to most agencies for […]

Notice & Comment

Fifth Circuit Review – Reviewed: Old Causes of Action and Growing Fissures in the Right 

In Intuit, Inc. v. FTC, the Fifth Circuit held that the FTC’s internal adjudication “of a deceptive advertising claim  .   .  .  violated the separation of powers.”  The decision is a major win for the conservative legal movement, which has long fought to curb the administrative state.  Time will tell whether it is a loss for the […]

Notice & Comment

Comparative Administrative Law New Scholarship Corner (March 2026)

Here is the list of works included in the March 2026 Comparative Administrative Law Scholarship Corner, which is curated by Eduardo Jordão (FGV Law School, Rio de Janeiro), with the assistance of Eduarda Onzi. The Scholarship Corner is a resource provided through the Comparative Administrative Law listserv. For more information about this terrific resource, check out my first […]

Notice & Comment

Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 Isn’t for Trade Deficits, by Christine Abely

On February 20, the Trump administration announced the imposition of tariffs pursuant to Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, a section designed to counteract balance-of-payments crises. A number of helpful articles have since appeared to explain that a trade deficit is not the same thing as a balance-of-payments deficit, let alone the sort of fundamental international payments […]

Notice & Comment

Ad Law Reading Room: “Making Broadcast Content Regulation Aggressive Again,” by Stuart Minor Benjamin

Today’s Ad Law Reading Room entry is “Making Broadcast Content Regulation Aggressive Again,” by Stuart Minor Benjamin. Here is the abstract: The Federal Communications Commission has statutory authority over broadcasting that far exceeds any governmental authority over online platforms, cable television, or newspapers: Every license renewal or transfer depends on the FCC’s determination that it […]

Notice & Comment

The Law of For Cause Removal, by Jane Manners and Lev Menand

For the first time in American history, the Supreme Court is poised to decide what it means for the president to remove a principal officer “for cause.” The case—which arises from the attempted removal of Lisa Cook, a member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System—has major implications for central bank independence […]

Notice & Comment

There Were Two Tariff Cases Before the Supreme Court. But it Threw One of Them Out. Luckily for Importers and Consumers, It Threw Out the Wrong One, by Harvey Reiter

Lost in the extensive coverage of the Supreme Court’s February 20, 2026 opinion invalidating most of President Trump’s tariffs was the fact that there were two related cases before it[1] and that it had entirely dismissed one of them. The lead case, in fact.  That coverage gap is understandable. The only mention the Court makes […]