Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

An RFP from the MLR

The Michigan Law Review is soliciting proposals for its annual book review for pieces “related to the recent (and ongoing) sea changes in administrative law.” From the request for proposal, which you can find here: This is a unique and expedited request—the call for Book Review submissions has closed for the year. However, the Editors […]

Notice & Comment

Call for Applications for the ABA Administrative Law Fellowship for Prospective Legal Academics

The American Bar Association’s Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice is pleased to sponsor the ABA Administrative Law Fellowship. The Fellowship, established in 2021, aims to diversify the cohort of legal academics in administrative law and regulatory practice by positioning lawyers currently in practice to be successful job candidates in the academic market. The […]

Notice & Comment

Teaching Skidmore in the post-Loper Bright World, by Michael Asimow

I’ve never been a fan of Chevron.  In particular, I didn’t like the game-playing around step one or all the confusion about step zero or step two.  Mostly I disliked the rigidity of Chevron. Assuming textual ambiguity of the statute, deference to an agency’s interpretation is sometimes warranted, sometimes not.  As a result, I prefer the Skidmore approach which grants weight to the […]

Notice & Comment

D.C. Circuit Review: Reviewed – Catching Up

In the first week of July, the D.C. Circuit issued five administrative-law opinions. First, in Evergreen Shipping Agency (America) Corp. v. Federal Maritime Commission, the court vacated an order that involved late fees for borrowed shipping containers. In April 2020, an ocean carrier (Evergreen) gave several loaded shipping containers to a trucking company (TCW) at […]

Notice & Comment

Analyzing Judge Cannon’s Opinion: Was Jack Smith Legally Appointed?, by Thomas Berry

In November 2022, Attorney General Merrick Garland appointed Jack Smith as a special counsel to investigate former President Donald Trump’s attempts to stay in power after the 2020 election. Smith is currently prosecuting Trump in two separate cases, one in Washington, D.C., and the other in Florida. But the Florida prosecution was recently upended by Judge Aileen […]

Notice & Comment

Confronting the Science-Policy Gap after Loper Bright and Ohio v. EPA: The FDA’s Struggle to Regulate Agricultural Water Quality, by Timothy D. Lytton

Statutory mandates to establish minimum thresholds for hazards that pose an unquantifiable risk of harm put regulators in a bind. And the Supreme Court’s administrative law decisions this term have exacerbated the problem.  Consider, for example, the FDA’s current struggle to regulate agricultural water quality.  Fresh produce, once considered the healthiest of foods, has become a major […]

Notice & Comment

Non-Deferential Deference: Michigan’s “Respectful Consideration” and Clues for the Future After Loper Bright, by Neena Menon

Chevron is dead, however deference may very well be alive. The majority in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo articulated no intelligible principle of deference other than tacit acknowledgement of Skidmore deference and potentially laying the path for de novo review. Nonetheless, some scholars have acknowledged that lower courts may function in fundamentally similar ways when […]

Notice & Comment

Upcoming ACUS Webinars: Recent Administrative Law Developments in the Supreme Court: What’s Next for Agencies?

From the website of the Administrative Conference of the United States: The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) is pleased to announce a public forum, Recent Administrative Law Developments in the Supreme Court: What’s Next for Agencies? Across four virtual panels beginning next Tuesday, July 30, ACUS members and researchers will discuss the significance of recent Supreme Court […]

Notice & Comment

Does the Seventh Amendment Limit State Administrative Adjudication?, by Keith Bradley

The Supreme Court’s recent decision in SEC v. Jarkesy seems destined to upend much federal regulatory enforcement.  A further potential consequence may be coming for state enforcement.  Whether state regulatory programs are vulnerable to a Jarkesy limitation depends on whether Jarkesy depends solely on the Seventh Amendment, or is a collaboration between the Seventh Amendment and Article III. Jarkesy dealt […]

Notice & Comment

The President Has No Constitutional Power of Impoundment, by Zachary S. Price

Donald Trump thankfully survived an assassination attempt last weekend and may well win back the presidency in November.  What constitutional theories might a second Trump administration advance? Trump himself has suggested one possibility:  He has promised to assert a “Constitutional power to stop unnecessary spending through what is known as Impoundment.”  In other words, a second-term President Trump would […]

Notice & Comment

The Scope of Change: Not only Loper Bright, but Corner Post too, by Allison Zieve

Two weeks ago, the Supreme Court issued two major decisions concerning judicial review of federal agency regulations. Already, plenty of ink has been spilled praising and deriding the decisions. But to understand whether the decisions should make you gleeful or panicked, it is important to understand both their limits and their breadth. In Loper Bright Enterprises […]