Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: A Happy New Year (But No New Administrative Law Yet) at the D.C. Circuit

The D.C. Circuit rung in the new year with three opinions. Two were administrative law opinions and one dealt with criminal law. For administrative lawyers, the first week of the new year brought no new law but rather straightforward applications of precedent concerning the FEC and FERC. In Campaign Legal Center v. FEC, the D.C. […]

Notice & Comment

Why I Oppose Kroger’s Purchase of Albertsons, by Felix B. Chang

Now that the grocery giant Kroger has certified its substantial compliance with the Federal Trade Commission’s request for information, the antitrust regulator must decide how to proceed with Kroger’s $24.6 billion acquisition of its rival Albertsons. Kroger happens to be based in Cincinnati, my hometown, where it’s an important part of the corporate base. However, I’m rooting against the […]

Notice & Comment

1/4/2024 AALS/FedSoc Panel: The Future of Student Loan Cancellation, State Standing, and the Major Questions Doctrine after Biden v. Nebraska

At the Association of American Law Schools (AALS) annual meeting in Washington, DC, this week, I’ll be moderating a terrific panel on the student loan cancellation cases the Supreme Court decided last term. The panel will take place on Thursday, January 4, 2024, from 4:45-6:30PM, and it will be livestreamed here. Here’s a description of […]

Notice & Comment

Jotwell Administrative Law Section 2023 Year-End Review

Since 2015, I’ve served as co-editor, currently with the brilliant Miriam Seifter, of the the Administrative Law Section of The Journal of Things We Like (Lots) (“Jotwell”).  Jotwell is a terrific resource for administrative law practitioners and scholars. Roughly once a month, Jotwell’s Administrative Law Section publishes a short review of a current piece of administrative law scholarship, usually […]

Notice & Comment

Ad Law Reading Room: “The Myth of the Federal Private Nondelegation Doctrine,” by Alexander Volokh

Today’s Ad Law Reading Room is “The Myth of the Federal Private Nondelegation Doctrine,” by Alexander Volokh, which was recently published by the Notre Dame Law Review and posted to SSRN. Here is the abstract: Judges and scholars have often claimed that delegations of governmental power to private parties are constitutionally prohibited. However, such a […]

Notice & Comment

D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: Win or Lose

Belatedly, here are the summaries of last week’s decisions. Yesterday’s unsealed opinion in United States v. Trump will await a future post.  Both decisions from last week come in lawsuits against Attorney General Garland relating to matters that have been in the news. The first, Langeman v. Garland, concerns the FBI’s decision to terminate Michael […]

Notice & Comment

What Issues are Fair Game in Moore v. United States?, by Conor Clarke

On December 5th, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Moore v. United States, a constitutional challenge to the mandatory repatriation tax (“MRT”) in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.  The case raises basic questions about the scope of Congress’s taxing power, and has the potential to reshape and limit federal taxation.  (Ben Silver had a nice […]

Notice & Comment

Administrative Law SSRN Reading List, November 2023 Edition

Here is the November Edition of the most-downloaded recent papers (those announced in the last 60 days) from SSRN’s U.S. Administrative Law eJournal, which is edited by Bill Funk. For more on why SSRN and this eJournal are such terrific resources for administrative law scholars and practitioners, check out my first post on the subject here. You can check […]

Notice & Comment

CEI Report on Agency Adjudication Reform

Today, the Competitive Enterprise Institute has released a new report, by Ryan Young and Stone Washington, entitled Conflict of Justice: Making the Case for Administrative Law Court Reform. Here’s a taste of the report, from conclusion: Administrative law courts are unfair and regressive. They violate the separation of powers. They do not relieve regular court […]

Notice & Comment

Is Chevron Binding Law?, by Randy J. Kozel

In a pair of cases set for argument in January, the U.S. Supreme Court has been asked to overrule Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. I’m going to suggest that whether Chevron should be overruled isn’t exactly the right question. That’s because Chevron—at least the part of it that most people are interested in—didn’t make binding […]

Notice & Comment

Supreme Myths Podcast on Chevron, Jarkesy, MQD, and All Things Administrative Law

Earlier this week I sat down with Eric Segall to participate in his Supreme Myths podcast. We chatted about about all things administrative law, including the major questions doctrine, the current cases (Loper Bright and Relentless) before the Supreme Court challenging Chevron deference, and SEC v. Jarkesy, the constitutional challenge the Court heard last week […]

Notice & Comment

Updating the Legal Profession for the Age of AI, by Kevin Frazier

Artificial intelligence (AI) is kryptonite to the Rule of Law. Where the Rule of Law demands “clear, general, publicly accessible rules laid down in advance,” advances in AI occur for unknown reasons, at unknown times, and with unknown effects. Where the Rule of Law requires prospective regulation, AI advances faster than the courts and Congress can handle. And, where the Rule of Law cautions against […]