Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Which Appropriations Power?: Getting Back to Basics in the Supreme Court’s Upcoming CFPB Funding Case, by Chad Squitieri

Next term the Supreme Court will hear argument in CFPB v. Community Financial, which concerns whether the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) may constitutionally receive its funding from the Federal Reserve, rather than through the annual appropriations process.  The case presents the Court an opportunity to address an important point made earlier this summer by Justice Thomas in a dissenting […]

Notice & Comment

Of Major Questions and Nondelegation, by Patrick J. Sobkowski

My goal in this essay is to explain why the Major Questions Doctrine (MQD) has become such a powerful tool to the Supreme Court’s conservative majority and why it seems to be replacing, along with the unitary executive theory, the nondelegation doctrine as one of the primary means of constraining congressional and administrative power. What the […]

Notice & Comment

D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: And We’re Off!

The administrative law headline for the past week is that the Supreme Court has again invoked the Major Questions Doctrine to hold agency action unlawful—this time, President Biden’s student loan forgiveness program. In a separate opinion, Justice Barrett offers a thoughtful explication of that doctrine. In her view, it merely “emphasize[s] the importance of context […]

Notice & Comment

­­Let’s talk about that Barrett concurrence (on the “contextual major questions doctrine”), by Beau J. Baumann­­

As many of you know, the Supreme Court just shot down the student-loan forgiveness plan in Biden v. Nebraska. The majority opinion written by John Roberts predictably held that the HEROES Act does not empower the Secretary of Education to cancel loans on the scale envisioned by the Biden Administration. In a separate subsection (see pgs. 19–25 […]

Notice & Comment

Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo – Perhaps Not the Best Vessel to Help Clarify Application of Chevron, by Tyler Scandalios

Putting aside for the moment the possibility of the Supreme Court overruling Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984) (“Chevron”), in the coming term the Supreme Court will hear argument on and consider, in the case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (“Loper”), whether the Court should “clarify that statutory silence concerning controversial powers […]

Notice & Comment

Building the Administrative State We Need, by K. Sabeel Rahman

*This post is part of a symposium on Modernizing Regulatory Review. For other posts in the series, click here. It has been a pleasure to read the thoughtful commentary from scholars and practitioners in this Notice & Comment blog series on modernizing regulatory review. The contributions provide a range of important critiques and recommendations to inform […]

Notice & Comment

Internationalizing Regulatory Review, by Elena Chachko

*This post is part of a symposium on Modernizing Regulatory Review. For other posts in the series, click here. The contributions to this symposium illuminate many important aspects of the Biden Administration’s push to “modernize” regulatory review. One big innovation of that push is injecting international considerations into that process more than ever before. Executive Order 14,094 and […]

Notice & Comment

West Virginia v. EPA One Year On   

My article, West Virginia, the Inflation Reduction Act, and the Future of Climate Policy, in the July issue of the Environmental Law Reporter, examines two momentous events in summer 2022 with broad implications for the nation’s capacity to tackle dangerous climate change. One year ago tomorrow, in West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, the Supreme Court formally […]

Notice & Comment

Ad Law Reading Room: “The Founders’ Purse,” by Christine Kexel Chabot

Today’s Ad Law Reading Room features “The Founders’ Purse” by Professor Christine Kexel Chabot. Here is the abstract: This Article addresses a new and impending war over the constitutionality of broad delegations of spending power to the executive branch. In an opening salvo, the Fifth Circuit held that Congress unconstitutionally delegated its power of the […]

Notice & Comment

Pacific Legal Foundation Call for Papers: Doctrinal Crossroads: Major Questions, Non-Delegation, and Chevron Deference

From the Pacific Legal Foundation: Pacific Legal Foundation’s Center for the Separation of Powers and the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy seek papers for “Doctrinal Crossroads: Major Questions, Non-Delegation, and Chevron Deference,” a symposium to be held in early 2024 in Boston. In soliciting papers on these ideas, we’re seeking a deeper examination […]