Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

No Surprises? Texas Medical Association v. HHS: Part III

Summary: A recent district court decision, Texas Medical Association v. HHS, Dkt No. 6:21-CV-425 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 23, 2022), accessible on WESTLAW at Medicare & Medicaid Guide ¶307259 (C.C.H.), 2022 WL 597141, has troubling implications both for agencies’ traditional authority to create rebuttable presumptions and for the scope of Administrative Procedure Act section 553’s “good […]

Notice & Comment

No Surprises? Texas Medical Association v. HHS: Part II

Summary: A recent district court decision, Texas Medical Association v. HHS, Dkt No. 6:21-CV-425 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 23, 2022), accessible on WESTLAW at Medicare & Medicaid Guide ¶307259 (C.C.H.), 2022 WL 597141, has troubling implications both for agencies’ traditional authority to create rebuttable presumptions and for the scope of Administrative Procedure Act section 553’s “good […]

Notice & Comment

Free ABA AdLaw Webinar, 3/31 Noon: Understanding Agency Self-Regulation

Please join us for: Understanding Agency Self-Regulation Virtual Live Webinar Thursday March 31, 2022 12 pm – 1:30 pm Eastern Time Via Zoom Confirmed Panelists: Christopher Curtis, Principal Deputy General Counsel (Retired), Federal Housing Finance Agency, Washington, DC Richard F. Griffin, Of Counsel, Bredhoff & Kaiser PLLC, Washington, DC Lynden Melmed, Partner, Berry Appleman & […]

Notice & Comment

Apportionment Transparency in the 2022 CAA: The Return of Congressional Institutionalism?, by Matthew B. Lawrence

The 2022 Consolidated Appropriations Act that President Biden signed into law on March 15 includes a new and important restraint on the tool of presidential administration made famous by former President Trump’s interference with aid to Ukraine, namely, apportionment. This blog post highlights this restraint, then explains why it is surprising in ways that could […]

Notice & Comment

Rulemakings at Multimember Agencies by Todd Phillips

I’ve recently accepted a publication offer from the Yale Journal on Regulation for my new article titled Commission Chairs, a draft of which is available on SSRN. My article is a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the statutes creating and governing 82 federal multimember agencies (commissions) to understand the powers given to commission chairs and […]

Notice & Comment

Shhh! Don’t Say Glomar Anymore

Summary: This post summarizes a report adopted by the FOIA Advisory Committee on March 10, 2022, regarding the use of a Glomar response to neither confirm nor deny the existence of records responsive to a FOIA request. Perhaps Howard Hughes is somewhere grimacing right about now. In 1968, at the height of the Cold War, […]

Notice & Comment

“Delegation at the Founding” and the Shifting Debate About Nondelegation and Originalism, by Eli Nachmany

Perhaps the most famous line from Justice Elena Kagan’s confirmation hearing was Justice Kagan’s submission that “we are all originalists now.” In the context of originalism and the nondelegation doctrine, we are all responding to Professors Julian Mortenson and Nicholas Bagley now. As those familiar with the nondelegation debates know, Professors Mortenson and Bagley published […]

Notice & Comment

No Surprises? Texas Medical Association v. HHS: Part I

Summary: A recent district court decision, Texas Medical Association v. HHS, Dkt No. 6:21-CV-425 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 23, 2022), accessible on WESTLAW at Medicare & Medicaid Guide ¶307259 (C.C.H.), 2022 WL 597141, has troubling implications both for agencies’ traditional authority to create rebuttable presumptions and for the scope of Administrative Procedure Act section 553’s “good […]

Notice & Comment

International Factors in Domestic Regulation: What the District Court Got Wrong in Louisiana v. Biden, by Elena Chachko

Can agencies consider international factors when they regulate domestically absent explicit statutory authorization? A case now before the Fifth Circuit raises precisely this question. In Louisiana v. Biden—yet another environmental policy case—ten states seek to undo one of President Biden’s key climate change regulatory initiatives. The Louisiana district court concluded that considerations related to global […]

Notice & Comment

Humanizing Immigration and Refugee Law through the Great Books: A Review of Clamouring for Legal Protection, by Ana Luquerna

*From 2019-2020, Professor Robert F. Barsky contributed a series of pieces to Notice & Comment on the rights of refugees and vulnerable migrants, available here. Clamouring for Legal Protection is a must-read for any current or aspiring attorney. This insightful book demonstrates the crucial need to go beyond the law to be a good lawyer. […]