Notice & Comment

D.C. Circuit Review

Notice & Comment

D. C. Circuit Review: Reviewed – Just in the nick of time

The Supreme Court hears oral argument today in Trump v. Slaughter, (No. 25-332), to decide whether Humphrey’s Executor v. U.S., 295 U.S. 602 (1935), should be overruled.  On Friday, the D. C. Circuit weighed in to the ongoing debate over Humphrey’s Executor just in time to add to the weekend reading of the justices’ law clerks. President Trump fired […]

Notice & Comment

D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: Planes, Trucks, and an En Banc Denial

The D.C. Circuit decided one merits case involving the Essential Air Service program, stayed an interim final rule governing commercial driver’s licenses, and denied en banc rehearing of the mandamus order in the Alien Enemies Act case. Essential Air Service First, in Southern Airways Express, LLC v. U.S. Department of Transportation, the court unanimously denied a […]

Notice & Comment

D.C. Circuit Review—Reviewed: NEPA Deference, FOIA Deference, and More 

Last week, the D.C. Circuit released an opinion deferring to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in light of Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County; an opinion deferring to the FBI in a Freedom of Information Act case; an opinion vacating a FERC order that departed from the cost-causation principle; an opinion on standing; and an […]

Notice & Comment

D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: Science, Reliance, and Regulatory Line-Drawing

Last week at the D.C. Circuit was one of unanimous published opinions in four administrative law cases, which highlighted the principle that scientific determinations are due significant deference, the requirement that agencies reasonably explain the regulatory lines they draw, and the importance of addressing reliance interests when changing policy. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Kennedy was […]

Notice & Comment

D.C. Circuit Review—Reviewed: Tucker Act

The Tucker Act has been in the news a lot lately, as a centerpiece of litigation over various Trump Administration grant terminations. The Tucker Act requires parties with contract claims against the government to bring those claims in the Court of Federal Claims. The Court of Federal Claims can award damages, but unlike a federal […]

Notice & Comment

D.C. Circuit Review—Reviewed: Notice and Comment, Judicial Discipline, and More

Last week, the D.C. Circuit adopted an interesting remedy in a notice-and-comment case; dealt with an analogy between administrative proceedings and judicial disciplinary proceedings; and addressed the standards for scientific studies in an arbitrary-and-capricious case. It also issued an order staying an injunction against the removal of two members of the National Credit Union Administration. […]

Notice & Comment

D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: Executive Power Edition

The D.C. Circuit issued seven opinions last week, but most of them were not administrative law cases. They addressed international arbitration (disclosure: I represented amici in support of appellees in that case); constitutional claims related to reincarceration following a mistaken release; fraud claims against federal employees; the False Claims Act; and whistleblower awards for reports […]