Notice & Comment

D.C. Circuit Review

Notice & Comment

D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: Five Years After the Death of the Clerkship Plan

If you peruse the D.C. Circuit’s webpage often — and, really, who doesn’t? 😉 — you’ve no doubt noticed an announcement that hasn’t changed for a long time: This may confuse you. First, why is dated “2014-15”? And second, why is an announcement about clerkship hiring of all things given arguably the most prominent placement […]

Notice & Comment

D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: The I-Don’t-Have-Time-To-Read-It-All Version of PHH Corp. v. CFPB

At long last, the en banc D.C. Circuit has decided PHH Corp. v. CFBP. This case — which, of course, we have discussed many times here at Notice & Comment — concerns the constitutionality of the restrictions on the President’s ability to remove the CFPB director (namely, only for “for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or […]

Notice & Comment

D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: “The judgment of the D.C. Circuit is therefore reversed ….”

If you are a regular reader (“Hi, Mom!”*), you might think that D.C. Circuit Review — Reviewed does too much cheerleading for the D.C. Circuit. After all, although I make exceptions, I generally try not to offer my view about whether the Court’s opinions are right or wrong. Plus I try — hopefully successfully– not […]

Notice & Comment

D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: “I vote for Chenery I, not Chenery II”

Steve Calabresi “nearly broke the internet” with his remarks last week at the Federalist Society National Lawyers Convention. But something else was said at the Convention — with less fanfare — that strikes me as more significant. The speaker? White House Counsel Don McGahn. The subject? The two Chenery cases. Here is what McGahn said*: […]