Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Separation of Powers, Criminal Law, & Cert Petitions from the Second Circuit

Often criminal law doctrines are viewed as separate and distinct from the regulatory state or general structural constitutional principles.  But this Term the Court has before it several significant petitions that raise questions related to structural constitutional protections in the context of criminal law.  Professor Steve Vladeck of Texas Law School and I discuss two […]

Notice & Comment

Free ABA AdLaw Section Webinar, 10/4 Noon: Reviewing the Department of Education’s Proposed Title IX Regulations

Education Committee of the ABA Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice Presents Reviewing the Department of Education’s Proposed Title IX Regulations Tuesday October 4, 2022 12 pm – 1:00 pm Eastern Time Via Zoom In June, the Department of Education proposed new Title IX regulations that will change how educational institutions nationwide respond to […]

Notice & Comment

On Ricky Revesz’s Nomination to Head the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs

On Thursday, the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs (HSGAC) will hold its confirmation hearing on the nomination of NYU Law Professor Ricky Revesz to head the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs — a position which is been dubbed the President’s “regulatory czar.” Over at E&E News today, Jean Chemnick has a nice […]

Notice & Comment

The Meaning of “Set Aside” in 5 U.S.C. § 706(2), by John Harrison

This post adds to the debate about the meaning of “set aside” in 5 U.S.C. § 706(2). That provision of the Administrative Procedure Act instructs courts reviewing agencies to “hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions” that meet the descriptions that follow, such as those that are “contrary to constitutional right, power, […]

Notice & Comment

SB 8’s Fines Are Criminal, by Guha Krishnamurthi

Texas’s SB 8 law has a unique structure of private enforcement. When it was passed, it was designed to circumvent the then-existing-constitutional protections for abortion healthcare. SB 8 specifically barred public enforcement and instead allowed private actors to stop abortions or collect a bounty for abortions already performed. The bounty regime allows “any person, other […]

Notice & Comment

FTC Litigation After Seila Law

Daniel Fisher at Legal Newsline has authored a fascinating story about ongoing litigation between the FTC and Walmart that presents weighty constitutional questions about the FTC’s litigation authority after Seila Law v. CFPB. Here’s how Fisher’s story begins: Days after the Federal Trade Commission accused Walmart of helping scam artists defraud customers by using its […]

Notice & Comment

Associational Standing in the Affirmative Action Cases

This Term, the Supreme Court is set to hear argument in two cases on affirmative action in college admissions.  One of the cases is against Harvard, the other against the University of North Carolina. Both universities have policies that permit the consideration of race in making admissions decisions.  The question presented is whether considering race […]