Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

Notice & Comment

The Major Question Doctrine, Nondelegation, and Presidential Power, by Daniel Farber

*This is the seventh post in a symposium on Peter Shane’s “Democracy’s Chief Executive: Interpreting the Constitution and Defining the Future of the Presidency.” For other posts in the series, click here. In West Virginia v. EPA, the Supreme Court struck down Obama’s signature climate regulation based on the major question doctrine. The Court’s rationale was […]

Notice & Comment

Visions of a Progressive Regulatory Movement: Remarks on Democracy’s Chief Executive by Peter M. Shane, by Glen Staszewski

*This is the sixth post in a symposium on Peter Shane’s “Democracy’s Chief Executive: Interpreting the Constitution and Defining the Future of the Presidency.” For other posts in the series, click here. In Democracy’s Chief Executive, Peter Shane provides powerful critiques of originalism and unitary executive theory, and he recognizes that this interpretive methodology and substantive […]

Notice & Comment

Resisting Originalism, Even When “Done Well”, by Lisa Heinzerling

*This is the fifth post in a symposium on Peter Shane’s “Democracy’s Chief Executive: Interpreting the Constitution and Defining the Future of the Presidency.” For other posts in the series, click here. In Democracy’s Chief Executive, Peter Shane skillfully exposes the partisan beginnings and baleful effects of originalism as a theory for understanding the constitutional separation […]

Notice & Comment

What Kind of Democracy? by Keith E. Whittington

*This is the fourth post in a symposium on Peter Shane’s “Democracy’s Chief Executive: Interpreting the Constitution and Defining the Future of the Presidency.” For other posts in the series, click here. It is a pleasure to participate in this symposium on Peter Shane’s new book, Democracy’s Chief Executive: Interpreting the Constitution and Defining the Future […]

Notice & Comment

Can Originalism Survive the Lawlessness It Has Bred? A Prayer for a Stronger and Wiser Theory of Interpretation, by Victoria Nourse

*This is the third post in a symposium on Peter Shane’s “Democracy’s Chief Executive: Interpreting the Constitution and Defining the Future of the Presidency.” For other posts in the series, click here. Democracy’s Chief Executive is a wonderful antidote to the strange affection many have for the “unitary” executive, including our present Supreme Court. Peter Shane’s […]

Notice & Comment

Regulatory Budgets: Looking Back, Looking Forward

What have we learned so far about regulatory budgets, and what might the next iteration of Executive Order 13771 look like? Although E.O. 13771 is not currently on the books, future presidential administrations may decide to formulate their own versions of regulatory budgeting under OIRA’s management and oversight. So it’s good to learn from the […]

Notice & Comment

The Bloated and Dangerous Presidency, by Carlos A. Ball

*This is the second post in a symposium on Peter Shane’s “Democracy’s Chief Executive: Interpreting the Constitution and Defining the Future of the Presidency.” For other posts in the series, click here. American democracy is under threat from a frighteningly large number of sources, including from the insurrection of January 6th and the possibility of similar […]

Notice & Comment

No Opinions, But a Petition Worth Watching – Seventeen States Challenge Section 209(b) of the Clean Air Act

The D.C. Circuit did not release new opinions during the week of October 17. There were oral arguments in cases that we’ll follow at D.C. Circuit Review—Reviewed, including litigation over Exemption 4 to FOIA. But that’s not the biggest or most interesting news from last week at the D.C. Circuit. To my mind, the highlight […]

Notice & Comment

On the Waterfront:  The Solicitor General Weighs In

This post assesses the Solicitor General’s argument, in New York v. New Jersey, that Congressionally-ratified interstate compacts obligating states to ongoing obligation include an implicit right of unilateral withdrawal from the compact and assumption of a compact agency’s authority by the withdrawing state within its state boundaries.  The Solicitor General’s argument ignores state practices in […]

Notice & Comment

The Time to Stop a Runaway Presidency is Before it Starts, by Richard H. Pildes

*This is the first post in a symposium on Peter Shane’s “Democracy’s Chief Executive: Interpreting the Constitution and Defining the Future of the Presidency.” For other posts in the series, click here. Peter Shane characterizes the American presidency as now reflecting an “organizational culture of entitlement.” His book is primarily a critique of constitutional doctrines that […]

Notice & Comment

Symposium Introduction: Peter M. Shane, “Democracy’s Chief Executive: Interpreting the Constitution and Defining the Future of the Presidency,” by Andrea Scoseria Katz

*This is the introduction to a symposium on Peter Shane’s “Democracy’s Chief Executive: Interpreting the Constitution and Defining the Future of the Presidency.” For other posts in the series, click here. For years, Peter Shane has been sounding the alarm against an overgrown (here, he calls it “entitled”) presidentialism that seems to admit of no legal […]

Notice & Comment

Excluding the CFPB From Annual Appropriations Is Bad But Constitutional, by Zachary Price

The Fifth Circuit held last week that the Consumer Financial Protection Board (CFPB) cannot promulgate or enforce its regulations because, by law, it receives its operating funds each year from the Federal Reserve Board rather than time-limited appropriations statutes. The Fifth Circuit’s decision is incorrect, and especially so if one embraces the formalist approach to […]

Notice & Comment

The Solicitor General Embraces Phantom Tax Regulations

As discussed in a prior post, the Sixth Circuit in Whirlpool v. Commissioner, 19 F.4th 944 (6th Cir. 2021), embraced phantom regulations. The court concluded that a statute that contemplated rules applying “under regulations” could operate regardless of whether regulations had been issued under the statute. Though in Whirlpool the Treasury had issued regulations relevant […]